1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 952 kg more than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Caimano | DeVille |
Year Released | 1971 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 6952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3300 mm |