1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. (191 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Caimano | CTS |
Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 259 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 253 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |