1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo (230 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 776 kg more than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Cuneo | 60 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3230 mm |
