1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo vs. 1949 Buick 40
To start off, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo (230 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 647 kg more than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo | 1949 Buick 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Buick |
Model | Cuneo | 40 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 8800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 52.2 mm | 104.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1695 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3000 mm |