1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo vs. 1975 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1975 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo (230 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1975 Cadillac DeVille. (180 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo should accelerate faster than 1975 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1242 kg more than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo | 1975 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Cuneo | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 8192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 2290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3310 mm |
