1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo vs. 1986 Mazda 929

To start off, 1986 Mazda 929 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo (230 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mazda 929 weights approximately 577 kg more than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (259 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. (183 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. 1986 Mazda 929 has automatic transmission and 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo has manual transmission. 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Mazda 929 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo 1986 Mazda 929
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model Cuneo 929
Year Released 1971 1986
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2953 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 230 HP 190 HP
Engine RPM 8800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 183 Nm 259 Nm
Torque RPM 7000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.1 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 52.2 mm 77.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.9:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1048 kg 1625 kg
Vehicle Length 4110 mm 4930 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 910 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2720 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]