1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo vs. 1996 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo | 1996 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Cuneo | Taurus |
Year Released | 1971 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 910 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2760 mm |