1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. (230 HP @ 8800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 497 kg more than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. (183 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. 2003 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo has manual transmission. 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo 2003 Jaguar XJ
Make Alfa Romeo Jaguar
Model Cuneo XJ
Year Released 1971 2003
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2968 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 230 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 8800 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 183 Nm 293 Nm
Torque RPM 7000 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.1 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 52.2 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1048 kg 1545 kg
Vehicle Length 4110 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 910 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 3040 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]