1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo vs. 2006 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2006 Holden Caprice is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. (230 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. (183 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo. 2006 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo has manual transmission. 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Alfa Romeo Cuneo | 2006 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | Cuneo | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
