1971 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1971 Alfa Romeo Giulia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP) has 264 more horse power than 1971 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1971 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 827 kg more than 1971 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Giulia | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1971 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 345 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 40 L |