1971 Alpine A 110 vs. 1975 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1975 Triumph Stag is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1971 Alpine A 110. (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1971 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Triumph Stag (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alpine A 110. (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1975 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alpine A 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Alpine A 110 | 1975 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Alpine | Triumph |
| Model | A 110 | Stag |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 234 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 63 L |
