1971 Alpine A 110 vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alpine A 110 (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Because 1971 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alpine A 110. (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alpine A 110.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alpine A 110 | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Alpine | Holden |
Model | A 110 | Apollo |
Year Released | 1971 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2610 mm |