1971 Alpine A 110 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,606 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Alpine A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alpine A 110 (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Alpine A 110 (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1971 Alpine A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alpine A 110 | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 110 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1971 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2210 mm |