1971 Alpine A 110 vs. 2002 Honda Logo
To start off, 2002 Honda Logo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,606 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Alpine A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alpine A 110 (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2002 Honda Logo. (64 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Logo.
Because 1971 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Alpine A 110 (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Logo. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1971 Alpine A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Alpine A 110 | 2002 Honda Logo | |
| Make | Alpine | Honda |
| Model | A 110 | Logo |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 1343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2370 mm |
