1971 Alpine A 110 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1971 Alpine A 110. (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1971 Alpine A 110.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (299 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alpine A 110. (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alpine A 110.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alpine A 110 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A 110 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1971 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 299 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3270 mm |