1971 Alpine A 110 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1971 Alpine A 110. (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1971 Alpine A 110.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alpine A 110. (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alpine A 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Alpine A 110 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Alpine | Jeep |
| Model | A 110 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4684 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 82 L |
