1971 Austin 1800 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1971 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1971 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Austin 1800 weights approximately 3 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Austin 1800 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 1800 | 3 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |