1971 Austin 3 vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1971 Austin 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1971 Austin 3. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1971 Austin 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 652 kg more than 1971 Austin 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 Austin 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Austin 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Austin 3 | 1962 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 3 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1971 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 82 L |