1971 Austin 3 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Austin 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Austin 3 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Austin 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Austin 3 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix.

Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Austin 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Austin 3 (218 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 1971 Austin 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Austin 3 2005 Toyota Matrix
Make Austin Toyota
Model 3 Matrix
Year Released 1971 2005
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2910 cc 1794 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 161 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 91 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1345 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 45 L