1971 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Seat Ritmo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher.
Because 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1982 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Seat |
| Model | Sprite | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
