1971 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher.
Because 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Sprite | 6 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
