1971 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1971 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1971 Autobianchi A 112. (41 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1971 Autobianchi A 112. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1435 kg more than 1971 Autobianchi A 112. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Autobianchi A 112 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 79 L |
