1971 Bizzarrini GT vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Bizzarrini GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Bizzarrini GT would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1971 Bizzarrini GT. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1971 Bizzarrini GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Bizzarrini GT. (158 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Bizzarrini GT. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1971 Bizzarrini GT has manual transmission. 1971 Bizzarrini GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Bizzarrini GT | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
Model | GT | XF |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2908 mm |