1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1957 Buick 40
To start off, 1971 BMW 2002 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 1957 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 2002 | 40 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 248 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3110 mm |