1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1965 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1971 BMW 2002 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 1965 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 2002 | R 360 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 22 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 63 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 1770 mm |