1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1966 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1971 BMW 2002 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 1966 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 2002 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1971 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3300 mm |