1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1973 Rover P5B
To start off, 1973 Rover P5B is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 3,526 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Rover P5B (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Rover P5B (295 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 1973 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002. 1973 Rover P5B has automatic transmission and 1971 BMW 2002 has manual transmission. 1971 BMW 2002 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Rover P5B will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 1973 Rover P5B | |
| Make | BMW | Rover |
| Model | 2002 | P5B |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3526 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 295 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2820 mm |
