1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 2002 | 260 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 140 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 23.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2660 mm |