1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1983 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. (133 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado (270 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 1983 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 1983 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2002 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4080 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2900 mm |
