1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1992 Rover 400
To start off, 1992 Rover 400 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1992 Rover 400. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 400.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 1992 Rover 400 | |
| Make | BMW | Rover |
| Model | 2002 | 400 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |
