1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1996 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 1996 Lancia Kappa is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lancia Kappa. (186 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lancia Kappa.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 1996 Lancia Kappa | |
Make | BMW | Lancia |
Model | 2002 | Kappa |
Year Released | 1971 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 75.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |