1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1997 Lancia K
To start off, 1997 Lancia K is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Lancia K is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lancia K (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lancia K should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Lancia K, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lancia K (309 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 1997 Lancia K will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 1997 Lancia K | |
Make | BMW | Lancia |
Model | 2002 | K |
Year Released | 1971 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 309 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 75.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 243 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |