1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1998 Zagato Zuma
To start off, 1998 Zagato Zuma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1998 Zagato Zuma. (108 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1998 Zagato Zuma.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Zagato Zuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Zagato Zuma (235 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 1998 Zagato Zuma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 1998 Zagato Zuma | |
| Make | BMW | Zagato |
| Model | 2002 | Zuma |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1894 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2520 mm |
