1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1999 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1999 Honda CR-V is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Honda CR-V (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 1999 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 2002 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1971 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2620 mm |