1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2002 Jaguar X400

To start off, 2002 Jaguar X400 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.

Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 1971 BMW 2002 has manual transmission. 1971 BMW 2002 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1971 BMW 2002 2002 Jaguar X400
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 2002 X400
Year Released 1971 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 140 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 197 Nm 525 Nm
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2920 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]