1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (160 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 2002 | 2 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2500 mm |