1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2003 Fiat Albea
To start off, 2003 Fiat Albea is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Albea. (102 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Albea.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Albea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Albea. (145 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Albea.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2003 Fiat Albea | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 2002 | Albea |
Year Released | 1971 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1580 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2440 mm |