1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo V50 (320 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2003 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | 2002 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 18.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 204 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2760 mm |
