1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2004 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2002 | Impala |
Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 97.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2880 mm |