1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2004 Ford GT
To start off, 2004 Ford GT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford GT (494 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 354 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford GT (679 Nm) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2004 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2004 Ford GT | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2002 | GT |
Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 494 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 679 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 105.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.4:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 305 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2730 mm |