1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (245 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2002 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2870 mm |