1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (144 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (181 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 2002 | 6 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |