1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (172 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 2002 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2990 mm |
