1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (325 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 2002 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 100.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2730 mm |
