1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2006 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2006 Kia Carnival is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Carnival (182 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Carnival (343 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2006 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2006 Kia Carnival | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 2002 | Carnival |
Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2902 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 343 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 97.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2900 mm |