1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2006 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2006 Lincoln LS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln LS (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2006 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 2006 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | BMW | Lincoln |
| Model | 2002 | LS |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2910 mm |
