1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. (127 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | 2002 | Polo |
Year Released | 1971 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 127 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 172 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2470 mm |