1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 BMW 2002 (197 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (141 Nm). This means 1971 BMW 2002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 2002 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
