1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2009 Pontiac G6
To start off, 2009 Pontiac G6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac G6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac G6 (219 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac G6 should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac G6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac G6 (297 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2009 Pontiac G6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002. 2009 Pontiac G6 has automatic transmission and 1971 BMW 2002 has manual transmission. 1971 BMW 2002 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Pontiac G6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 2009 Pontiac G6 | |
| Make | BMW | Pontiac |
| Model | 2002 | G6 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 219 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 297 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 87.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2860 mm |
