1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1971 BMW 2002 has manual transmission. 1971 BMW 2002 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 2002 | XF |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2908 mm |
